Date: Sat, 8 Jan 2011 14:54:10 GMT From: Aldis Berjoza <aldis@bsdroot.lv> To: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: ports/153794: [PATHC] improve devel/violet port Message-ID: <201101081454.p08EsAvJ019643@red.freebsd.org> Resent-Message-ID: <201101081500.p08F0G63076611@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>Number: 153794
>Category: ports
>Synopsis: [PATHC] improve devel/violet port
>Confidential: no
>Severity: non-critical
>Priority: low
>Responsible: freebsd-ports-bugs
>State: open
>Quarter:
>Keywords:
>Date-Required:
>Class: maintainer-update
>Submitter-Id: current-users
>Arrival-Date: Sat Jan 08 15:00:16 UTC 2011
>Closed-Date:
>Last-Modified:
>Originator: Aldis Berjoza
>Release:
>Organization:
>Environment:
>Description:
In previous version violet wrapper script made violet run in background
I think it was wrong decision.
I think it's better to let user decide if he want to run violet in backround (when starting violet in shell)
Anyway look at the patch (it's very simple and explains everything) :_
>How-To-Repeat:
>Fix:
Patch attached with submission follows:
diff -u violet.bak/Makefile violet/Makefile
--- violet.bak/Makefile 2011-01-08 16:50:02.684879092 +0200
+++ violet/Makefile 2011-01-08 16:50:30.773804804 +0200
@@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
PORTNAME= violet
PORTVERSION= 0.21.1
+PORTREVISION= 1
CATEGORIES= devel editors java
MASTER_SITES= SF/${PORTNAME}/violetumleditor/${PORTVERSION}
DISTNAME= com.horstmann.violet-${PORTVERSION}
@@ -28,7 +29,7 @@
pre-install:
${ECHO} "#!/bin/sh" > ${WRKDIR}/violet.sh
- ${ECHO} "${PREFIX}/bin/java -jar ${JAVASHAREDIR}/${PORTNAME}/com.horstmann.violet.jar &" >> ${WRKDIR}/violet.sh
+ ${ECHO} "${PREFIX}/bin/java -jar ${JAVASHAREDIR}/${PORTNAME}/com.horstmann.violet.jar" >> ${WRKDIR}/violet.sh
do-install:
${MKDIR} ${JAVASHAREDIR}/${PORTNAME}
>Release-Note:
>Audit-Trail:
>Unformatted:
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?201101081454.p08EsAvJ019643>