From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jul 31 23:02:23 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4609316A41F for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:02:23 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from out2.smtp.messagingengine.com (out2.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.26]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6C1843D48 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:02:22 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com) Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com (frontend2.internal [10.202.2.151]) by frontend1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32852CC6735 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:02:21 -0400 (EDT) X-Sasl-enc: ZDKSmpJzC9OjOFytkXFo0KUP1jGr278kBBw3RibNeVLt 1122850940 Received: from gumby.localdomain (dsl-80-41-66-226.access.as9105.com [80.41.66.226]) by frontend2.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9988856F785 for ; Sun, 31 Jul 2005 19:02:20 -0400 (EDT) From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 1 Aug 2005 00:02:20 +0100 User-Agent: KMail/1.8.1 References: <20050731191241.3ca8846e.dick@nagual.st> In-Reply-To: <20050731191241.3ca8846e.dick@nagual.st> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200508010002.20748.list-freebsd-2004@morbius.sent.com> Subject: Re: what to do? amd64 - i386 X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2005 23:02:23 -0000 On Sunday 31 July 2005 18:12, dick hoogendijk wrote: > I know the OS itself will be faster, but how about > ports. The benchmarks I've seen have been a mixed bag. There's one in the AMD64 list where a webserver ran twice as fast on i384 than on amd64.