From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jan 18 19:42:06 2007 Return-Path: X-Original-To: ports@FreeBSD.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D847F16A47E for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alepulver@FreeBSD.org) Received: from relay00.pair.com (relay00.pair.com [209.68.5.9]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 806B213C459 for ; Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:42:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from alepulver@FreeBSD.org) Received: (qmail 51909 invoked by uid 0); 18 Jan 2007 19:15:25 -0000 Received: from 200.115.252.195 (HELO phobos.mars.bsd) (200.115.252.195) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 18 Jan 2007 19:15:25 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 200.115.252.195 Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 16:15:05 -0300 From: Alejandro Pulver To: pav@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20070118161505.6269a066@phobos.mars.bsd> In-Reply-To: <1168992245.22991.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> References: <45ACC615.2030200@joeholden.co.uk> <45AD0ABC.5070406@FreeBSD.org> <1168992245.22991.1.camel@ikaros.oook.cz> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 2.7.0 (GTK+ 2.10.7; i386-portbld-freebsd6.1) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_P7kD.bRX=2O6cAiP32gxi6q"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=PGP-SHA1 Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org, Joe Holden , Gabor Kovesdan , portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: security/dsniff: Marked BROKEN X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 19:42:06 -0000 --Sig_P7kD.bRX=2O6cAiP32gxi6q Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-2 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 01:04:05 +0100 Pav Lucistnik wrote: > Gabor Kovesdan p=ED=B9e v =FAt 16. 01. 2007 v 18:26 +0100: > > Joe Holden schrieb: > > > Does anyone know why this is the case? It builds and installs fine on= =20 > > > my machines. If its just a port conflict, surely just adding=20 > > > CONFLICTS to the makefiles of both libnet ports etc would do the tric= k? > > > > > > Or is there another reason? > > > > > It seems there is a long-standing issue with net/libnet, net/libnet10=20 > > and net/libnet-devel ports, that affect about 40 ports, and dsniff is=20 > > one of those. > >=20 > > See the following three PRs: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/97257 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/89098 > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/95733 > >=20 > > And one that is supposed tofix the issue: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3Dports/103861 > >=20 > > As it is a big change, that affects about 40 port, it needs=20 > > test/approval from the Ports Management Team. I put them into CC, maybe= =20 > > they can give you more information, how they want this issue fixed. If= =20 > > you can help, that's highly appreciated, please consult with them about= =20 > > the issue. >=20 > Interesting! I'd like to devote some time upcoming days to it. >=20 > Alejandro, can you provide me with an up-to-date patch for this? >=20 Sure, I will start working on them. When it's ready I will send a follow-up to the PR. Best Regards, Ale --Sig_P7kD.bRX=2O6cAiP32gxi6q Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc Content-Disposition: attachment; filename=signature.asc -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQFFr8dBiV05EpRcP2ERAkgsAJ4wCg64UkAJr8Fpjb6Cn/ntV8cuPgCfQEyr jZLkT1OAOI6ubY7kl4UpdjU= =Q7WI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_P7kD.bRX=2O6cAiP32gxi6q--