From owner-freebsd-chat Mon Sep 22 09:57:16 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id JAA28392 for chat-outgoing; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:57:16 -0700 (PDT) Received: from smtp.interlog.com (root@smtp.interlog.com [198.53.145.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id JAA28387 for ; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 09:57:13 -0700 (PDT) Received: from shell1.interlog.com (paulg@shell1.interlog.com [207.34.202.8]) by smtp.interlog.com (8.8.3/8.7.6) with SMTP id MAA25852; Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:56:27 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 22 Sep 1997 12:56:20 -0400 (EDT) From: Paul Griffith To: "Pedro Giffuni S," cc: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Linux faster thasn FreeBSD In-Reply-To: <3426A034.76B7@asme.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Paul Griffith - paulg@interlog.com On Mon, 22 Sep 1997, Pedro Giffuni S, wrote: > You are right... > 1) FreeBSD 2.1.6 is very old and has poor performance when compared to > 2.2.x. > 2) Linux usually FEELS faster in a single user environment, but it is no > match to a recent version of FreeBSD with many users and/or intensive > tasks. > > Additionally, it seems like you chose the slowest disk for a swap > partition and you probably didn't fine tune the kernel ;-). > > Pedro. So I should use the SCSI HD as my swap space ? What basic fine tuning would you suggest ? Paul Griffith