From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri Apr  9 12:14:28 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90DA816A4CE
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 12:14:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pernis.its.uu.se (pernis.its.UU.SE [130.238.4.153])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2DF2E43D49
	for <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 12:14:27 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from ante@update.uu.se)
Received: by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix, from userid 205)
	id 516A412240; Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:14:26 +0200 (MSZ)
Received: from pernis.its.uu.se(127.0.0.1) by pernis.its.uu.se via virus-scan 
	id s369; Fri, 9 Apr 04 21:14:18 +0200
Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (Tempo.Update.UU.SE [130.238.19.17])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(No client certificate requested)
	by pernis.its.uu.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id F32A712239;
	Fri,  9 Apr 2004 21:14:17 +0200 (MSZ)
Received: from localhost (amavis@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	ESMTP id i39JEH4S000793;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:14:17 +0200
Received: from Tempo.Update.UU.SE (ante@ip6-localhost [IPv6:::1])
	ESMTP id i39JE8rS000787;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:14:08 +0200
Received: from localhost (ante@localhost)
	with ESMTP id i39JE8jV000784;	Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:14:08 +0200
X-Authentication-Warning: Tempo.Update.UU.SE: ante owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 9 Apr 2004 21:14:07 +0200 (CEST)
From: Andreas Davour <ante@update.uu.se>
To: "Andrew L. Gould" <algould@datawok.com>
In-Reply-To: <200404091401.20444.algould@datawok.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092110300.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE>
References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net>
 <Pine.LNX.4.58.0404092042560.28354@Tempo.Update.UU.SE>
 <200404091401.20444.algould@datawok.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem
X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: User questions <freebsd-questions.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-questions>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-questions>,
	<mailto:freebsd-questions-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:14:28 -0000

On Fri, 9 Apr 2004, Andrew L. Gould wrote:

> On Friday 09 April 2004 01:55 pm, Andreas Davour wrote:
[snip]
> > If anyone can shed some light on those matters, then I'm all ears. I can't
> > get a new version of Firefox to compile without atk so I'm very interested
> > in getting this to work.
> >
> > I have run 'pkgdb -F' and tried to remove the dependecy, but have not
> > succeeded. I'm not even sure it would be wise to do it...
>
> Did you remember to execute 'pkgdb -Uu' after cvsup and before portupgrade?

So be quite frank, I have no idea! I think I followed all instructions
quite litterally. But portupgrade was mentioned in the handbook and the
"cookbook" examples I found on the web differed somewhat. I no longer
remembered if I did a 'pkgdb -Uu' or not.

I there any telltale signs showing in the narrative in my first post that
indicates I forgot it? Is it recommendable I run it now then?

/andreas