Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 19 Apr 2001 23:47:12 -0700
From:      "Charles Burns" <burnscharlesn@hotmail.com>
To:        vince@oahu.WURLDLINK.NET, lplist@closedsrc.org
Cc:        jgowdy@home.com, kris@obsecurity.org, mwlist@lanfear.com, freebsd@sysmach.com, questions@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: the AMD factor in FreeBSD
Message-ID:  <F84TvJHNA5FC39nl6gv00004afb@hotmail.com>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
>	Interesting.  I guess I never read about how AMD did it...  I just
>remember reading a comparison of the Pentium versus the PowerPC 603 I
>think and it somehow gave the indication that Intel CPU's were CISC
>with RISC and the PowerPC was 100% RISC.

What is 100% RISC though? RISC has become something of a marketing term that 
has died but still lives on in the memories of those who were caught up in 
it. RISC clasically means that the chip has less instructions and that they 
are simpler. Less and simpler than what?
There is apparently more to all of this and I am still recovering from Mike 
Meyer's comments

Everyone should read this article:
http://arstechnica.com/cpu/4q99/risc-cisc/rvc-1.html

This should help quite a bit.

> > In reality... the x86 processors and, what people tend to call, RISC
> > processors now are really post-RISC. Trying to expand IPC and increase
> > Mhz :) Intel went the opposite with the P4.
>
>	True but speaking about AMD, PIII and the likes, where does the
>Xeon fit in?

Xeon is simply a P2 or P3 that has lots of on-chip cache memory and is 
extremely overpriced. Theoretically this cache memory helps greatly with 
software such as Oracle, but I can't see it more than making up for the huge 
clockspeed penalty that Xeon's have. (They are always of a lower clockspeed 
than P3s)
Xeon's also have the artificial multiprocessing cap set higher, or so I have 
heard, so that you can use 8 in a machine rather than just 2.
Has enybody tested this? I have never heard of anybody putting 8 P3s into a 
motherboard. I wonder if it is Intel marketing rather than a real limit 
because it seems that it would be difficult to manually limit a CPU to only 
work with so many others.
Because the ASIC chips deal with most fo the SMP stuff--how would the P3 
really know whether it was in a 2-way or 8-way system? I don't have the 
money to test this out. If anybody would, I would be greatful to have this 
question answered.
_________________________________________________________________
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?F84TvJHNA5FC39nl6gv00004afb>