Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 12:47:48 +0700 From: Bachilo Dmitry <root@solink.ru> To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: nve0: device timeout (1) Message-ID: <200603281247.49142.root@solink.ru> In-Reply-To: <4428CA90.7090501@FreeBSD.org> References: <20060328044432.152CD45047@ptavv.es.net> <4428CA90.7090501@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
=F7 =D3=CF=CF=C2=DD=C5=CE=C9=C9 =CF=D4 =F7=D4=CF=D2=CE=C9=CB 28 =ED=C1=D2= =D4 2006 12:33 Sergey Matveychuk =CE=C1=D0=C9=D3=C1=CC(a): > Kevin Oberman wrote: > > I must apologize. This patch is from David G. Lawrence of Download > > Technologies. He posted Saturday in a thread titled "nve timeout (and > > down) regression?" > > Does nve(4) detect unplugging a network cable well with the patch? Patch, by the way, was rejected. I have edited if_nve.c by hands, just chan= ged=20 watchdog manually from 8 to 0 and recompiled the kernel. The problem is gon= e.=20 But I am accessing this pc using ssh now, so I can't check unplugging the=20 cable. I'll test this 6 hours later and report. Actually this is no difference for me, I never unplug the cable so it is li= ke=20 a solution for the most people i think. =2D-=20 =2D----------------------- =F3 =D5=D7=C1=D6=C5=CE=C9=C5=CD, =E2=C1=DE=C9=CC=CF =E4=CD=C9=D4=D2=C9=CA =F2=D5=CB=CF=D7=CF=C4=C9=D4=C5=CC=D8 =CF=D4=C4=C5=CC=C1 =D3=C9=D3=D4=C5=CD= =CE=CF=CA =C9=CE=D4=C5=C7=D2=C1=C3=C9=C9 =EF=EF=EF "=EB=CF=CD=D0=C1=CE=C9=D1 =F3=CF=EC=C9=CE=CB"
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200603281247.49142.root>