Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:21:46 -0800 From: "Peter Steele" <psteele@maxiscale.com> To: <freebsd-net@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Having problems with limited broadcast Message-ID: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479FCE@polaris.maxiscale.com> In-Reply-To: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479FB0@polaris.maxiscale.com> References: <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479DF2@polaris.maxiscale.com> <28b9b4180901070039x27a25bb4m6b50c8bfae63e0af@mail.gmail.com><2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479E9A@polaris.maxiscale.com><4964CA2E.5090708@wezel.com> <2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479FB0@polaris.maxiscale.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> Thanks for the suggestion though. I'm not familiar with ZeroConf; I'll > check it out. ZeroConf is an interesting concept. Unfortunately it restricts IPs to the 169.254/16 range and it is very likely some of our customers will want to be able to configure our boxes to an IP range of their own choosing. That's the biggest concern we have with this facility. It's definitely attractive, but I don't think we can use unfortunately.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?2ACA3DE8F9758A48B8BE2C7A847F91F2479FCE>