From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Nov 17 14:27:28 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2E4016A468 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QK=b8e8f737@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from turtle-out.mxes.net (turtle-out.mxes.net [216.86.168.191]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7803513C442 for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:27:28 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from fbsd06+QK=b8e8f737@mlists.homeunix.com) Received: from mxout-04.mxes.net (mxout-04.mxes.net [216.86.168.179]) by turtle-in.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06B94163F6C for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:04:06 -0500 (EST) Received: from gumby.homeunix.com. (unknown [87.81.140.128]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.mxes.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id A852DD05AC for ; Sat, 17 Nov 2007 09:03:46 -0500 (EST) Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:03:37 +0000 From: RW To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20071117140337.513fb3e3@gumby.homeunix.com.> In-Reply-To: <200711171116.06705.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> References: <200711171116.06705.peter.schuller@infidyne.com> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.0.2 (GTK+ 2.12.1; i386-portbld-freebsd6.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: sysutils/etcmerge vs mergemaster X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 17 Nov 2007 14:27:28 -0000 On Sat, 17 Nov 2007 11:15:58 +0100 Peter Schuller wrote: > Hello, > > etcmerge, with three-way merging, has been available for a while, but > the man page still warns of it not being extensively tested, and of > course mergermaster still seems to be the officially supported tool. > > In spite of this, etcmerge is attractive since, to be honest, > manually saying "yes update" to a bunch of files that mostly have > only CVS revision changes is a waste of time. Isn't that what the -U option in mergemaster does? -U Attempt to auto upgrade files that have not been user modified. BTW does etcmerge handle the merging of passwd and groups well, because that's what I hate more than anything else about upgrading.