From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jan 18 12:08:27 2006
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
X-Original-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A100716A41F
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:08:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz
	[195.122.204.152])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51BF143D48
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:08:26 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from pav.hide.vol.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by e0-a11.b1.lan.prg.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4) with ESMTP id
	k0IC8OtB004434; Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:08:24 +0100 (CET)
	(envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from pav@localhost)
	by pav.hide.vol.cz (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id k0IC8Nh2004433;
	Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:08:23 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from pav@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: pav.hide.vol.cz: pav set sender to pav@FreeBSD.org
	using -f
From: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org>
To: Roderick van Domburg <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl>
In-Reply-To: <43CE19C7.9080202@student.utwente.nl>
References: <200601180721.k0I7LRD9073699@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<43CE19C7.9080202@student.utwente.nl>
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature";
	boundary="=-0F8tJjh8VFyWB9ulfbv+"
Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 13:08:22 +0100
Message-Id: <1137586102.76844.2.camel@pav.hide.vol.cz>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.4.2.1 FreeBSD GNOME Team Port 
Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: ports/91828: New port: net/rubygem-net-ssh Non-interactive SSH
	processing
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: pav@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:08:27 -0000


--=-0F8tJjh8VFyWB9ulfbv+
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO8859-2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Roderick van Domburg p=ED=B9e v st 18. 01. 2006 v 11:34 +0100:
> Hi Pav,
> > Synopsis: New port: net/rubygem-net-ssh Non-interactive SSH processing
> >
> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
> > State-Changed-By: pav
> > State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 07:20:58 UTC 2006
> > State-Changed-Why:=20
> > New port added _into security category_ instead of net (all ssh ports a=
re
> > in security). I also fixed ruby-password dependency.
> >
> > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=3D91828
> >  =20
>=20
> OK. The reason I initially put it into net, is because p5-Net-SSH is=20
> there as well.
> rubygem-net-ssh and p5-Net-SSH are basically doing the same thing.
>=20
> Should either then be moved?

Hmm, probably they should.

--=20
Pav Lucistnik <pav@oook.cz>
              <pav@FreeBSD.org>

Just because you're an angel doesn't mean you have to be a fool.

--=-0F8tJjh8VFyWB9ulfbv+
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Toto je =?iso-8859-2?Q?digit=E1ln=EC?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_podepsan=E1?= =?iso-8859-2?Q?_=E8=E1st?=
	=?ISO-8859-1?Q?_zpr=E1vy?=

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQBDzi+2ntdYP8FOsoIRAtUUAJ4viX9rAmV5ixd+pL6nUpwlOILSHACfbywQ
UD+sF8cjYJs8bsMJ/DyxZA8=
=Ru4X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--=-0F8tJjh8VFyWB9ulfbv+--