Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2017 03:47:17 +0000 (UTC) From: jbeich@freebsd.org (Jan Beich) To: bdrewery@FreeBSD.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r434326 - head/security/luasec Message-ID: <20170218034717.CDBBF762D@freefall.freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <201702180258.v1I2wkRh055782@repo.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
[1~Bryan Drewery <bdrewery@FreeBSD.org> writes: > Author: bdrewery > Date: Sat Feb 18 02:58:46 2017 > New Revision: 434326 > URL: https://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/ports/434326 > > Log: > Fix security/luasec-51 to have the proper PKGNAMEPREFIX of lua51- after r434315. [...] > +.if !defined(SLAVE_PORT) > USES= lua ssl > +.endif Try to avoid SLAVE_PORT conditionals in ports. In this case ?= would have been enough e.g., USES?= lua ssl or dedup USES=ssl in the slave via USES?= lua USES+= ssl As for origin I wish lua ports follow python example e.g., security/lua-luasec security/lua51-luasec unlike statu quo where package *prefix* ends up as port *suffix*.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20170218034717.CDBBF762D>