From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Dec 17 20:23:07 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7266B209 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:07 +0000 (UTC) Received: from luigi.brtsvcs.net (luigi.brtsvcs.net [204.109.60.246]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DF0D16C4 for ; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from chombo.houseloki.net (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:21c:c0ff:fe7f:96ee]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by luigi.brtsvcs.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 17BA02D4F8E; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:22:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29] (unknown [IPv6:2601:7:2580:181:baca:3aff:fe83:bd29]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by chombo.houseloki.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D3E96197A; Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:22:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <5491E61B.9070505@bluerosetech.com> Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 12:22:51 -0800 From: Darren Pilgrim Reply-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.3.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: jd1008 , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: zfs and 512/4096 sector sizes References: <5491E462.2020902@sentex.net> <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <5491E5A0.9090306@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 20:23:07 -0000 On 12/17/2014 12:20 PM, jd1008 wrote: > > On 12/17/2014 01:15 PM, Mike Tancsa wrote: >> status: One or more devices are configured to use a non-native block >> size. >> Expect reduced performance. > The status report does not identify the offending drive, > so if you remove the drive (instead of replacing it), > do you still get the same status report? It shows the sector size mismatch for ada11 in the vdev configuration list. Does the zpool clear command make it go away?