From owner-freebsd-office@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 9 17:42:01 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: office@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A69AF106566B for ; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:42:01 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C4B78FC1B; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:42:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q59Hg19p026881; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:42:01 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) Received: (from bapt@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id q59Hg1vN026880; Sat, 9 Jun 2012 17:42:01 GMT (envelope-from bapt@FreeBSD.org) X-Authentication-Warning: freefall.freebsd.org: bapt set sender to bapt@FreeBSD.org using -f Date: Sat, 9 Jun 2012 19:41:58 +0200 From: Baptiste Daroussin To: Dominic Fandrey Message-ID: <20120609174158.GK60433@ithaqua.etoilebsd.net> References: <4FC863AC.8010004@bsdforen.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4FC863AC.8010004@bsdforen.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15) Cc: office@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: [patch] libreoffice-i18n broken X-BeenThere: freebsd-office@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Office applications on FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2012 17:42:01 -0000 --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 08:39:40AM +0200, Dominic Fandrey wrote: > Just a small single line fix, affects all users who do not build WITH_ALL. >=20 > Found with my tinderbox (requeuing libreoffice-i18n wouldn't update > libreoffice). >=20 > --=20 > A: Because it fouls the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > A: Top-posting. > Q: What is the most annoying thing on usenet and in e-mail? Should be fixed now. thanks for reporting regards, Bapt --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.19 (FreeBSD) iEYEARECAAYFAk/TiuYACgkQ8kTtMUmk6Ez8igCfW0WsZhcsOsRz73Vb9Vy8pLKs A1sAoIf6p8gb1+27Tw4UqOW2r5B3ZqfX =6Mgz -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Qo8f1a4rgWw9S/zY--