From nobody Tue Jun 8 20:10:13 2021 X-Original-To: freebsd-current@mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mlmmj.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B793B5D369B; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) Received: from mail.protected-networks.net (mail.protected-networks.net [202.12.127.228]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "mail.protected-networks.net", Issuer "R3" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4G01Z64PV1z4h5s; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 20:10:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from imb@protected-networks.net) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d= protected-networks.net; h=content-transfer-encoding :content-language:content-type:content-type:in-reply-to :mime-version:user-agent:date:date:message-id:from:from :references:subject:subject; s=201508; t=1623183013; bh=WOFopupj kazh9lGSkOeedbz64sHpDzIvzV+4VXUyZsg=; b=FG2O9Z9LqgxEvCe/L1RHWO7B 5OxdfJqe6ctdqM7KMShg3u1Wlb6YTIouG8d1z1lS1j6Z2w3awgUPE8OmCd3pLuVa mepORULf5gnMaJBJpmWkMnLHZb2o3KEERYXBI3XXLBs52vbkROTaW5GUTVAO/ciN MDg8L4YKDbjyz32wzGw= Received: from toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net (toshi.auburn.protected-networks.net [192.168.1.10]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: imb@mail.protected-networks.net) by mail.protected-networks.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 7312028CC1; Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:10:13 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Re: 14-CURRENT/aarch64 build problem To: Juraj Lutter Cc: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org, freebsd-current References: <12319609-40E7-429A-B290-9C01B0A8ACDC@FreeBSD.org> <20210608193805.GA24803@www.zefox.net> Message-ID: Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2021 16:10:13 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Archive: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-current List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-NZ Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: 4G01Z64PV1z4h5s X-Spamd-Bar: ---- Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org; none X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-4.00 / 15.00]; REPLY(-4.00)[] Reply-To: imb@protected-networks.net From: Michael Butler via freebsd-arm X-Original-From: Michael Butler X-ThisMailContainsUnwantedMimeParts: N On 6/8/21 3:42 PM, Juraj Lutter wrote: > > >> On 8 Jun 2021, at 21:38, bob prohaska wrote: >> >> FWIW, same problem seen here. In an added twist, git pull (hoping for >> a fix) fails also: >> >> root@www:/usr/src # git pull >> error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy' >> From https://git.freebsd.org/src >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/legacy -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/legacy (unable to update local ref) >> error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master' >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/master -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/master (unable to update local ref) >> error: cannot lock ref 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release': 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs' exists; cannot create 'refs/remotes/freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release' >> ! [new branch] vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release -> freebsd/vendor/openzfs/zfs-2.1-release (unable to update local ref) >> >> Is this a problem at my end, or the server's end? > > This already has been documented, as the old openzfs branch has been renamed/moved. > > $ git remote prune freebsd > $ git pull > > See: https://lists.freebsd.org/archives/freebsd-git/2021-June/000015.html Having pulled a completely new tree (rm -rf /usr/src/*; git clone), I get the following failure .. did I miss something? ===> cddl/lib/libicp_rescue (obj,all,install) Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/cddl/lib/libicp_rescue/libicp_rescue.so.3 building shared library libicp_rescue.so.3 Building /usr/obj/usr/src/amd64.amd64/cddl/lib/libicp_rescue/_libinstall ===> cddl/lib/libspl (obj,all,install) make[4]: make[4]: don't know how to make atomic.S. Stop `assert.c' is up to date. `list.c' is up to date. `mkdirp.c' is up to date. `page.c' is up to date. `timestamp.c' is up to date. `zone.c' is up to date. `include/sys/list.h' is up to date. `include/sys/list_impl.h' is up to date. `getexecname.c' is up to date. `gethostid.c' is up to date. `getmntany.c' is up to date. `mnttab.c' is up to date. `atomic.S' was not built (being made, type OP_DEPS_FOUND|OP_MARK, flags REMAKE|DONE_WAIT|DONE_ALLSRC|DONECYCLE)! `afterdepend' was not built (deferred, type OP_DEPENDS|OP_NOTMAIN|OP_PHONY|OP_DEPS_FOUND|OP_MARK, flags REMAKE|DONE_WAIT|DONECYCLE)! `afterdepend' has .ORDER dependency against .depend (deferred, type OP_DEPENDS|OP_NOPATH|OP_DEPS_FOUND|OP_MARK, flags REMAKE|DONE_WAIT|CYCLE|DONECYCLE) `assert.o' was not built (unmade, type OP_DEPENDS|OP_NOPATH|OP_HAS_COMMANDS|OP_DEPS_FOUND|OP_MARK, flags REMAKE|DONE_WAIT|DONECYCLE)! `list.o' was not built (unmade, type OP_DEPENDS|OP_NOPATH|OP_HAS_COMMANDS|OP_DEPS_FOUND|OP_MARK, flags REMAKE|DONE_WAIT|DONECYCLE)! ` [ .. etc. .. ] imb