Date: Sun, 04 Jul 2004 15:25:07 -0700 From: "Kevin Oberman" <oberman@es.net> To: n0g0013 <ttz@cobbled.net> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEADSUP: ibcs2 and svr4 compat removed, linux to follow Message-ID: <20040704222507.60EE55D08@ptavv.es.net> In-Reply-To: Your message of "Sun, 04 Jul 2004 21:23:09 BST." <20040704202309.GA30837@eyore.cobbled.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
--==_Exmh_-1531293084P Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline > Date: Sun, 4 Jul 2004 21:23:09 +0100 > From: n0g0013 <ttz@cobbled.net> > Sender: owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org > > On 02.07-19:31, Brad Knowles wrote: > [ ... ] > > Yup. PGP sign everything, and make sure that your keys don't > > ever get stolen or compromised. That makes it much harder for > > someone to successfully impersonate you. > > what is the story with PGP signatures these days? last i > investigated there was a multi-part mime format that was meant > to be standard and nobody used (except mutt, which i use). > > does anyone use that format or is it all inline now? mutt > won't recognise the inline format as signed (and consequently > won't verify the content). mutt need to be fixed. I use exmh which generates multipart MIME PGP and works fine dealing with either single part or multipart PGP signed messages. -- R. Kevin Oberman, Network Engineer Energy Sciences Network (ESnet) Ernest O. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory (Berkeley Lab) E-mail: oberman@es.net Phone: +1 510 486-8634 --==_Exmh_-1531293084P Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Exmh version 2.5 06/03/2002 iD8DBQFA6IPCkn3rs5h7N1ERAnROAKCXW9lPJ1yUJASLhnwsdsTXVL1J9wCfewrt ebhFfJ59rY5mManig3FL76c= =6CvQ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --==_Exmh_-1531293084P--
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20040704222507.60EE55D08>