From owner-freebsd-current Tue Mar 11 8: 6:22 2003 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38EDA37B401; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:06:21 -0800 (PST) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (critter.freebsd.dk [212.242.86.163]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E2B743FB1; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 08:06:20 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) Received: from critter.freebsd.dk (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by critter.freebsd.dk (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h2BG6Isf072041; Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:06:18 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from phk@phk.freebsd.dk) To: Ruslan Ermilov Cc: Flag_reda , FreeBSD_Current Subject: Re: What's happened to bpf? From: "Poul-Henning Kamp" In-Reply-To: Your message of "Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:56:30 +0200." <20030311155630.GA49417@sunbay.com> Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2003 17:06:18 +0100 Message-ID: <72040.1047398778@critter.freebsd.dk> Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG In message <20030311155630.GA49417@sunbay.com>, Ruslan Ermilov writes: >Because of "device cloning"; devices are created on demand. "device cloning" is really a wrong name for this, and I regret that I every used that term. "On demand device creation" is closer, but it doesn't have any sort of ring to it. -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 phk@FreeBSD.ORG | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message