From owner-freebsd-ports  Sat Apr 19 06:40:06 1997
Return-Path: <owner-ports>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA16975
          for ports-outgoing; Sat, 19 Apr 1997 06:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id GAA16960;
          Sat, 19 Apr 1997 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 06:40:02 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <199704191340.GAA16960@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports
Cc: 
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: ports/3333: new port of korean/fvwm95 
Reply-To: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

The following reply was made to PR ports/3333; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
To: junker@jazz.snu.ac.kr
Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/3333: new port of korean/fvwm95 
Date: Sat, 19 Apr 1997 06:33:48 -0700

 > >Synopsis:       new port request of korea/fvwm95
 
 Hmmm.  You're not planning on reduplicating the entire ports
 hierarchy under ports/korea, are you? :-)
 
 Just curious - what specifically was done to fvwm95 in this case to
 "koreanize" it?  It seems a shame that we can't simply take a single
 port (like this one) and make it more I18N aware rather than having n
 copies of it under each language subdirectory, don't you think?
 
 This isn't a big point, please don't get me wrong, I'm just curious,
 mostly.
 
 Thanks!
 
 					Jordan