From owner-freebsd-ports Sat Apr 20 9: 3:46 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from pendragon.tacni.net (radius.tacni.net [64.247.218.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2C3B37B41B for ; Sat, 20 Apr 2002 09:03:43 -0700 (PDT) Received: (qmail 12454 invoked by alias); 20 Apr 2002 16:03:38 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO there) (216.201.213.67) by tacni.net with SMTP; 20 Apr 2002 16:03:38 -0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" From: Erich Zigler To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: removal of QT1/KDE1 ports Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 11:03:38 -0500 X-Mailer: KMail [version 1.3.2] References: <200204201541.g3KFfZX33329@cwsys.cwsent.com> In-Reply-To: <200204201541.g3KFfZX33329@cwsys.cwsent.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Message-Id: <20020420160343.E2C3B37B41B@hub.freebsd.org> Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org On Saturday 20 April 2002 10:41 am, you wrote: > > On Saturday 20 April 2002 05:45 am, you wrote: > > > I don't agree at all. How about people using older hardware? Those > > > computers, e.g. old laptops, can run KDE1 just fine, but don't have > > > the power to run KDE[23]. Or shall we assume that only fast hardware > > > is supported? Please, don't turn FreeBSD into a kind of RedHat thing. > > So, we're supposed to let the ports system grow bloated with old > > archaeic packages? That probably not even 1% of the userbase will use? > This reminds me, now that tripwire 2.3.1 has been in the tree for a few > months, I'd like to remove the tripwire 1.2 and 1.3.1 ports. Any > objections? months != years -- If at first you don't succeed, nuclear warhead disarmament should *not* be your first career choice." To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message