Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 07 Mar 2002 15:20:03 -0700 (MST)
From:      "M. Warner Losh" <imp@village.org>
To:        jhb@FreeBSD.org
Cc:        mobile@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   Re: NEWCARD doesn't like my cardbus card anymore
Message-ID:  <20020307.152003.123976395.imp@village.org>
In-Reply-To: <XFMail.020307171507.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
References:  <XFMail.020307171507.jhb@FreeBSD.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In message: <XFMail.020307171507.jhb@FreeBSD.org>
            John Baldwin <jhb@FreeBSD.org> writes:
: Warner,
: 
: Looks like recent newcard still doesn't like my cardbus dc0.  Adding the
: IO_RANGE option didn't help.  It looks like the CIS that newcard finds for the
: card doesn't have any BAR's for memory or IO, so bus_alloc_resource() freaks
: out when the dc driver tries to allocate resources for those BARs.  When it
: panics (I know you've fixed hte panic, but I think the card would still not
: probe now):
: 
: cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x59
: cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
: cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
: pccbb alloc res fail
: 
: When it works on an old kernel:
: 
: found-> vendor=0x13d1, dev=0xab02, revid=0x11
:         class=02-00-00, hdrtype=0x00, mfdev=0
:         cmdreg=0x0000, statreg=0x0290, cachelnsz=8 (dwords)
:         lattimer=0xa8 (5040 ns), mingnt=0xff (63750 ns), maxlat=0xff (63750 ns)
:         intpin=a, irq=128
: cardbus0: Expecting link target, got 0x59
: cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=10, size=100
: cardbus0: Resource not specified in CIS: id=14, size=400
: cardbus0: Non-prefetchable memory at 84002000-840023ff
: cardbus0: Non-prefetchable memory rid=14 at 84002000-840023ff (400)
: cardbus0: IO port at 1100-11ff
: cardbus0: IO port rid=10 at 1100-11ff
: dc0: <Abocom FE2500 10/100BaseTX> port 0x1100-0x11ff mem 0x84002000-0x840023ff i
: rq 11 at device 0.0 on cardbus0
: 
: Note that the PCI-ish dump doesn't include any BAR's for 0x10 and 0x14.  Is
: there a bug in our CIS reading code maybe?  Or perhaps this is a bum card?

I don't think that you have PCI_ALLOW_UNSUPPORTED_IO_RANGE defined, or
you'd get some spewage.  The 0x84000000 address is the old fallback
address, and the pci bridge is now filtering that out.

Warner


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-mobile" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20020307.152003.123976395.imp>