Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2009 17:37:55 -0400 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: dynamic and static DNS in the samie name server Message-ID: <4A47E2B3.8040103@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090628170140.7169d64b@bhuda.mired.org> References: <4A47CC07.1080506@gmail.com> <20090628170140.7169d64b@bhuda.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Mike Meyer wrote: > On Sun, 28 Jun 2009 16:01:11 -0400 > "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> wrote: > > >> We have a name server set up that contains all our static IP's (in >> office but not for remote workers because they all have dynamic >> IP's).... we currently use dns/no-ip2 to manage this but I was >> wondering if it is possible to (easily) configure our internal >> nameserver to do this? >> > > This question is really more appropriate for -questions than > -hackers. If you asked on -questions and didn't get an answer there or > someone there pointed you here, you should let us know: it's always > wise to indicate previous research. > > You also didn't say what you were using for your internal name server, > which makes the matter of "easily" hard to answer. If you're a bind > expert, it's easy. If you're not a bind expert but using bind, it > probably isn't. Personally, I use dns/dnsmasq for such situations, as > that's pretty much what it's designed to do. It's also very > light-weight, sufficiently so that the various FOSS router builds > include it. > > <mike > > Thanks for attempting to help me find the right place to post but in my experience -questions@ tends to be about "standard" usage not "non-standard" usage questions thus I asked here... yes I am using BIND (the base system one)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4A47E2B3.8040103>