From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 5 07:52:44 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73CF71065672 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 07:52:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B1F48FC14 for ; Wed, 5 May 2010 07:52:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta09.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id DjqJ1e0041eYJf8A9jskFx; Wed, 05 May 2010 07:52:44 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.46.159]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id Djsj1e0053S48mS01jsj4t; Wed, 05 May 2010 07:52:44 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 4693B9B425; Wed, 5 May 2010 00:52:42 -0700 (PDT) Date: Wed, 5 May 2010 00:52:42 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Giulio Ferro Message-ID: <20100505075242.GA57550@icarus.home.lan> References: <4BDEA86E.3050109@zirakzigil.org> <20100503110100.GA93137@icarus.home.lan> <4BDEC106.3040807@zirakzigil.org> <4BE110E3.8040902@zirakzigil.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BE110E3.8040902@zirakzigil.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Freebsd 8.0 kmem map too small X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 05 May 2010 07:52:44 -0000 On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 08:32:03AM +0200, Giulio Ferro wrote: > Giulio Ferro wrote: > >Thanks, I'll try these settings. > > > >I'll keep you posted. > > Nope, it's happened again... Now I've tried to rise vm.kmem_size to 6G... Did you set both vm.kmem_size and vfs.zfs.arc_max, setting the latter to something *less* than vm.kmem_size? > I'm really astounded at how unstable zfs is, it's causing me a lot > of problem. > > Why isn't it stated in the handbook that zfs isn't up to production yet? I'm not at liberty to comment + answer this question. -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |