From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 25 18:10:38 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C50B516A4CE for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:38 +0000 (GMT) Received: from rip.psg.com (rip.psg.com [147.28.0.39]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A538C43D58 for ; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:38 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from randy@psg.com) Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=roam.psg.com) by rip.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQ82X-0008jd-I0; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:37 +0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=roam.psg.com.psg.com) by roam.psg.com with esmtp (Exim 4.50 (FreeBSD)) id 1DQ82W-0002D9-F8; Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:10:36 -1000 From: Randy Bush MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <17005.12955.757773.350868@roam.psg.com> Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 08:10:35 -1000 To: Matthias Buelow References: <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org> <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de> cc: stable@freebsd.org cc: Palle Girgensohn Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work? X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2005 18:10:38 -0000 >> not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be >> consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and > Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly? i am convinced, but some of the hosts seem not to be :-) i see shutdowns which 0 0 0 0 and then shut, and when restarted single user and fscked manually show errors. though i think this may be in current, which is on most of my hosts. randy