From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Apr 9 12:16:30 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6950116A4CE for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ns1.tiadon.com (SMTP.tiadon.com [69.27.132.161]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2954343D3F for ; Fri, 9 Apr 2004 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdk@daleco.biz) Received: from daleco.biz ([69.27.131.0]) by ns1.tiadon.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.0); Fri, 9 Apr 2004 14:17:12 -0500 Message-ID: <4076F68C.70909@daleco.biz> Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 14:16:28 -0500 From: "Kevin D. Kinsey, DaleCo, S.P." User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040406 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Andreas Davour References: <4076527F.1060902@users.sourceforge.net> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-OriginalArrivalTime: 09 Apr 2004 19:17:13.0125 (UTC) FILETIME=[43355550:01C41E67] cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Portupgrade problem X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Apr 2004 19:16:30 -0000 Andreas Davour wrote: >Hi! > >And it is correct in that there *is* no accessibility/atk port in my new >cvsup'ed ports tree. But why is it then telling me it needs it!? > > Because it's a dependancy of about 538 distinct ports, at least one of which you must have installed.... GNOME, perhaps .... Kevin Kinsey