From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 20 04:10:14 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E5AD37B401 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:10:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org [216.136.204.21]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EB1A843FB1 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org) Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (gnats@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h3KBADUp051534 for ; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h3KBADio051533; Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:10:13 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <200304201110.h3KBADio051533@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org From: David Schultz Subject: Re: bin/51151: du hardlinkmatching is slow - fix included X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: David Schultz List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 11:10:15 -0000 The following reply was made to PR bin/51151; it has been noted by GNATS. From: David Schultz To: Peter van Dijk Cc: FreeBSD-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: bin/51151: du hardlinkmatching is slow - fix included Date: Sun, 20 Apr 2003 04:01:09 -0700 On Sun, Apr 20, 2003, Peter van Dijk wrote: > On Sun, Apr 20, 2003 at 02:51:49AM -0700, David Schultz wrote: > [snip] > > In libc, there are hcreate(3) and friends, which work nicely except > > for their limitation of one hash table per module. That shouldn't > > be an issue here. Alternatively, you could roll your own easily > > enough. Here's some pseudocode using chaining: > > I tried hcreate but it failed miserably. I may investigate that some > more (it seemed to misbehave on my input) and send-pr about it. > > I intend to roll my own with open addressing indeed. Cool. One caveat I forgot about: you have to deal with expansion in that case. Might not be worth it.