Date: Fri, 21 Dec 2001 06:30:37 -0600 (CST) From: hawkeyd@visi.com (D J Hawkey Jr) To: ofsenfreebsd@yahoo.com, questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: current state of delayed_ack Message-ID: <200112211230.fBLCUbQ05946@sheol.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20011221094502.18144.qmail_web9303.mail.yahoo.com@ns.sol.net> References: <20011221094502.18144.qmail_web9303.mail.yahoo.com@ns.sol.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
In article <20011221094502.18144.qmail_web9303.mail.yahoo.com@ns.sol.net>, ofsenfreebsd@yahoo.com writes: > Hi; > > I have read (I don't know where) that delayed ack has > a problem in freebsd-stable and suggested to turn it > off. But I had a situation that I can't connect to > www.suse.com:80 (for example) but after enabling it I > can connect to that site. Normally with delayed_ack > turned off I am receiving Push flag set packet from > server but then server (www.suse.com:80 in my case) > send me R. > > I have the same problem with login.icq.com. > > My question is: Is the delayed_ack is still buggy in -STABLE? I followed the thread in hackers@. I've got patches based on Matt's work at "http://www.visi.com/~hawkeyd/freebsd-backports.html". Dave -- Windows: "Where do you want to go today?" Linux: "Where do you want to go tomorrow?" FreeBSD: "Are you guys coming, or what?" To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?200112211230.fBLCUbQ05946>