From owner-freebsd-current Wed May 15 19:41:28 1996 Return-Path: owner-current Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) id TAA15246 for current-outgoing; Wed, 15 May 1996 19:41:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.3/8.7.3) with ESMTP id TAA15239 for ; Wed, 15 May 1996 19:41:25 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.7.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id TAA06880; Wed, 15 May 1996 19:38:25 -0700 (PDT) To: Michael Smith cc: kuku@gilberto.physik.rwth-aachen.de (Christoph P. Kukulies), freebsd-current@freefall.freebsd.org Subject: Re: /stand/ee In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 16 May 1996 10:41:31 +0930." <199605160111.KAA01107@genesis.atrad.adelaide.edu.au> Date: Wed, 15 May 1996 19:38:25 -0700 Message-ID: <6878.832214305@time.cdrom.com> From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > I agree that vi is not available in a standalone situation > > but after a successful installation or when /usr/bin/vi > > is available something else (vi) rather than /stand/ee should be > > chosen. It's vipw and not eepw and not emacspw :-) > > Oh yawn. If you know how to use vi you know how to set EDITOR in > your .cshrc. If you don't, then you want something a little more > intuitive. And, FWIW, I don't even like `ee' all that much - it's NOT the most intuitive of editors, it was simply both small and available. People keep suggesting `pico' to me, and it's what BSD/OS uses (so one could almost sort of claim an attempt at compatibility), but I've never seen it broken out of pine so I don't know how big it itself is. Jordan