From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jun 7 02:24:29 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6001816B7B5 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:19:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: from nz-out-0102.google.com (nz-out-0102.google.com [64.233.162.194]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D863043D49 for ; Wed, 7 Jun 2006 02:19:29 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from leafy7382@gmail.com) Received: by nz-out-0102.google.com with SMTP id 13so68278nzn for ; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=UN6B3iqJzInMt/RpuvVPMuDeDo8+jffh3n6VIhH1g3ga4yR1OtMFzmPush1LrTrHEQf/M6k5rfb2kax75nNRxdaWgZ39IBjMQ66Syx8oOGEtchqRHC1vDPymdM1UNmSpMT/grWO2ORCeeToboKVWnf/hpuoTx/RKZDCsEW/1oXo= Received: by 10.65.241.17 with SMTP id t17mr26688qbr; Tue, 06 Jun 2006 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.65.112.17 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Jun 2006 19:19:27 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: Date: Wed, 7 Jun 2006 10:19:27 +0800 From: "Jiawei Ye" To: "Kris Kennaway" In-Reply-To: <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4485DBF5.3070705@FreeBSD.org> <20060606211113.GA7845@xor.obsecurity.org> <20060607021330.GA11189@xor.obsecurity.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Sergey Matveychuk Subject: Re: portupgrade ideas page X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 07 Jun 2006 02:24:32 -0000 On 6/7/06, Kris Kennaway wrote: > If you use fetchindex, this is expected. If you build the index > yourself, but have your customizations in pkgtools.conf, it is also > expected. This is why you should use make.conf for your > customizations. > > Kris Hi Kris, I *know* that there are limitations in the base tools or what to expect. sysutil/portmanager can do this well enough (correct dependancy), that's why I *wish* portupgrade could do this too. It's a wishlist right? If all customizations are to be done in make.conf, what is the point of MAKE_ARGS in pkgtools.conf? I merely beg to complete the circle, not to point fingers at anyone. Have a nice day, Jiawei -- "Without the userland, the kernel is useless." --inspired by The Tao of Programming