From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Mar 2 09:41:58 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0EF3216A420 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:41:58 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: from zproxy.gmail.com (zproxy.gmail.com [64.233.162.199]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97BAD43D48 for ; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 09:41:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from infofarmer@gmail.com) Received: by zproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id i11so377052nzh for ; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:41:57 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:cc:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=Uv5FIdtEYgJ8AB542nhrHv8sA+le+CkhThMqKij2vvFS1g2ukHSAPT4RZ59fS2c0WgVCOzsRVBGtpw5Vn4xUiZ1yO5YvnxPW9JqdR6D4/rvpoeY+f3Z2m7f+im0Vf2RIWWhBKp9DuzNUGXiZJFOsnYEFbjiAuEe0KaZotnGWN5w= Received: by 10.36.22.8 with SMTP id 8mr1573538nzv; Thu, 02 Mar 2006 01:41:57 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.37.20.11 with HTTP; Thu, 2 Mar 2006 01:41:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: Date: Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:41:57 +0300 From: "Andrew Pantyukhin" To: Peter In-Reply-To: <20060302062834.74430.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Disposition: inline References: <20060302062834.74430.qmail@web60018.mail.yahoo.com> Cc: freebsd-questions Subject: Re: question on leaf ports X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 09:41:58 -0000 On 3/2/06, Peter wrote: > Hi gang. Does a leaf port have no build dependants or > no run dependants? I want to be assured that I can > remove a leaf port but not have to put it back in > order to upgrade another port. Utilities such as > portmaster show leaf ports and I'm not sure what it's > really telling me. I think the traditional sense of a leaf means no run dependants, as this seems to be the only kind of dependency registered in pkgdb. Consult the docs of your particular port management app.