Date: Fri, 9 Jun 2000 21:37:56 -0700 (PDT) From: Bill Woods <bwoods2@uswest.net> To: Rahul Siddharthan <rsidd@physics.iisc.ernet.in> Cc: mike johnson <ahze@wp.cc.nc.us>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: fbsd,bsdi,linux netscape Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.21.0006092137240.97301-100000@alpha.uswest.net> In-Reply-To: <20000610065248.B17646@physics.iisc.ernet.in>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I run the BSDi version, matter of fact, I ran it before it was in the ports and I find it more stable. Just my opinion though On Sat, 10 Jun 2000, Rahul Siddharthan wrote: > The freebsd version runs fine by itself, but there are some plugins > which are available only for the linux version. I don't know the > advantages of the bsdi version. > > mike johnson said on Jun 9, 2000 at 16:41:01: > > > > > > I sent a email a min ago from the wrong email address... and i couldnt get > > any responce ... sorry > > > > but , i see in /usr/ports/www that we have bsdi-netscape , linux-netscape , > > and netscape .. does one run better on freebsd ? > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.21.0006092137240.97301-100000>