Date: Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:17:57 -0800 From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" <tedm@toybox.placo.com> To: <doug@fledge.watson.org>, <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: RE: Some ideas for FreeBSD Message-ID: <BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCEEGACFAA.tedm@toybox.placo.com> In-Reply-To: <20080208131809.F12870@fledge.watson.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of > doug@safeport.com > Sent: Friday, February 08, 2008 10:53 AM > To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: RE: Some ideas for FreeBSD > > > Swapping systems may have performed better when thrashing started > because they > had lots of controls to say who (or what type of workload) got > screwed when > memory was scarce. :-) I think it was more something of the times - back then, it was "Look Ma, the elephant can dance!" Today, it's more along the lines of "which elephant dances the best?" Ted
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?BMEDLGAENEKCJFGODFOCEEGACFAA.tedm>