From owner-freebsd-net Mon Dec 2 2:47:47 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7BB2937B401 for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:47:46 -0800 (PST) Received: from sep.oldach.net (sep.oldach.net [194.180.25.6]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2613043EAF for ; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 02:47:45 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from hmo@sep.oldach.net) Received: from sep.oldach.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by sep.oldach.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/hmo29jun02) with ESMTP id gB2Albr6065561 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-DSS-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=NO); Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:47:38 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hmo@sep.oldach.net) Received: (from hmo@localhost) by sep.oldach.net (8.12.6/8.12.6/Submit) id gB2AlbLL065560; Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:47:37 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from hmo) Message-Id: <200212021047.gB2AlbLL065560@sep.oldach.net> Subject: Re: Multihoming - implementing RFC 1122 In-Reply-To: <3DEB30D9.A290D483@it.uc3m.es> from Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella at "Dec 2, 2002 11: 7:21 am" To: jrh@it.uc3m.es (Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella) Date: Mon, 2 Dec 2002 11:47:37 +0100 (CET) Cc: freebsdnet28nov02@oldach.net, freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG, marcelo@it.uc3m.es From: Helge Oldach MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Juan Francisco Rodriguez Hervella: > Helge Oldach escribió: > > I wonder whether there are plans to complete implementation of the > > "strong ES" model as described in RFC 1122 for multihoming hosts on > > FreeBSD. Essentially this would assure that a multihomed host would > > send and receive IP packets through the "correct" interface (that is, > > the physical interface that is configured with the IP address used in > > the packets). > I don't like the strong ES model. Then, don't use it. I am not asking to modify the default behaviour, I am just asking for extra functionality that you may use or not. > the strong ES model > makes use of source routing, You are mixing up source routing and policy routing. > I don't see why a host should discard a packet for him, only > because it has arrived at other interface. Anti-spoofing policies, for example. Helge To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message