From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 29 0:58:37 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from citusc17.usc.edu (citusc17.usc.edu [128.125.38.177]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C414437B404 for ; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:58:34 -0800 (PST) Received: (from kris@localhost) by citusc17.usc.edu (8.11.1/8.11.1) id eAT8xJ198401; Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:59:19 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kris) Date: Wed, 29 Nov 2000 00:59:19 -0800 From: Kris Kennaway To: Dennis Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: tarball releases Message-ID: <20001129005919.A98367@citusc17.usc.edu> References: <5.0.0.25.0.20001128160950.033784a0@mail.etinc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-md5; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP" Content-Disposition: inline User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i In-Reply-To: <5.0.0.25.0.20001128160950.033784a0@mail.etinc.com>; from dennis@etinc.com on Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:22:51PM -0500 Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Nov 28, 2000 at 04:22:51PM -0500, Dennis wrote: > Wouldnt putting up a compressed tarball of the releases reduce bandwidth= =20 > usage (and download time)? >=20 > I know I've asked this before, but it seems logical enough. They're already compressed tarballs. Kris --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org iEYEARECAAYFAjokxWcACgkQWry0BWjoQKVbRACfTI6dvcSVmWJ6W20ZphjW6Psa Pw0AoKZYtiXTe0176TEaBN6aqThU9sl1 =yCyL -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --5mCyUwZo2JvN/JJP-- To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message