From owner-freebsd-arm@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Jul 24 15:42:47 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: arm@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0A353B8E; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:42:47 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from monday.kientzle.com (99-115-135-74.uvs.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [99.115.135.74]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DA1A329A2; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: (from root@localhost) by monday.kientzle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) id r6OFTEjQ058818; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:29:14 GMT (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Received: from [192.168.2.123] (CiscoE3000 [192.168.1.65]) by kientzle.com with SMTP id xhuff5h9kgxp6zfexek45bt5sa; Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:29:14 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kientzle@freebsd.org) Subject: Re: Adding options to RPI-B Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1283) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Tim Kientzle In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 08:29:13 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <2C57A72F-0CB3-41DF-B0E5-1509348128BD@freebsd.org> References: To: Adrian Chadd X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1283) Cc: "freebsd-arm@freebsd.org" X-BeenThere: freebsd-arm@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting FreeBSD to the StrongARM Processor List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2013 15:42:47 -0000 On Jul 23, 2013, at 10:17 PM, Adrian Chadd wrote: > .. I'd rather we just make modules support work, and start shipping > stripped down kernels w/ modules. I've used modules; as far as I can tell, they work just fine. The status quo is historical legacy. > We have loader support for arm, right? :) Would someone please commit the change to the RPi kernel config to enable all modules by default? That will let us verify the current status before we start removing things that are currently static. Thanks, Tim