From owner-freebsd-current@freebsd.org Sat May 1 16:30:33 2021 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@mailman.nyi.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.nyi.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5863B631317 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 16:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from smtp.freebsd.org (smtp.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::24b:4]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256 client-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) client-digest SHA256) (Client CN "smtp.freebsd.org", Issuer "R3" (verified OK)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4FXZV12606z4gTx for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 16:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Received: from Ryans-MBP.attlocal.net (unknown [IPv6:2600:1700:358a:c660:4ca6:695:3dfd:8fe8]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: freqlabs/mail) by smtp.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2579D1B55 for ; Sat, 1 May 2021 16:30:33 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from freqlabs@FreeBSD.org) Subject: Re: ZFS going forward, on stable/13 vs. main: question To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: From: Ryan Moeller Message-ID: Date: Sat, 1 May 2021 12:30:31 -0400 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.15; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Language: en-US X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.34 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 01 May 2021 16:30:33 -0000 > Question . . . > > Are there any potential future upgrade issues with main > [so: 14] vs. stable/13 and releng/13.0 , say by main > updates involving ZFS updates in a way stable/13 or the > recent releng/13.* might not handle? There's no issue if you don't upgrade the pool on main with new features that aren't present in 13. It won't happen automatically, you'd have to manually run zpool upgrade. -Ryan