From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Nov 16 18:56:56 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 977DB16A4CE for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from mail2.dslextreme.com (mail2.dslextreme.com [66.51.199.52]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B394243F75 for ; Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:56:55 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from jos@catnook.com) Received: (qmail 25300 invoked from network); 17 Nov 2003 02:56:54 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO w250.z064001178.sjc-ca.dsl.cnc.net) (66.218.45.239) by 192.168.8.48 with SMTP; Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:56:54 +0000 Received: (qmail 7816 invoked by uid 1000); 17 Nov 2003 02:57:17 -0000 Date: Sun, 16 Nov 2003 18:56:54 -0801 From: Jos Backus To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Message-ID: <20031117025716.GA7470@lizzy.catnook.com> Mail-Followup-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org References: <20031115164720.I13393@hewey.af.speednet.com.au> <20031115184744.GA35692@dan.emsphone.com> <20031116074457.GA65261@lizzy.catnook.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20031116074457.GA65261@lizzy.catnook.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1i Subject: Re: dc still reporting collisions X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: jos@catnook.com List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Nov 2003 02:56:56 -0000 On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 11:44:35PM -0800, Jos Backus wrote: > On Sat, Nov 15, 2003 at 12:47:45PM -0600, Dan Nelson wrote: > > Are you sure your kernel, /usr/include/sys, and netstat are all > > up-to-date? > > I know mine are. What's odd in my case is that FreeBSD -> Windows works but > generates many collisions (11 MB file xfer results in roughly 8000 collisions) > but Windows -> FreeBSD doesn't work at all. It does smell like broken hardware > but nothing has changed in this setup in a while. Hm. Guess I'll have to run > that test with 4.9. I tried this today with 4.9, and the problem is still there (Windows -> FreeBSD: 6 KB/sec, FreeBSD -> Windows 330 KB/sec). At this point I'm assuming some kind of hardware-related problem. -- Jos Backus _/ _/_/_/ Sunnyvale, CA _/ _/ _/ _/ _/_/_/ _/ _/ _/ _/ jos at catnook.com _/_/ _/_/_/ require 'std/disclaimer'