From owner-cvs-usrbin Tue Feb 25 13:37:20 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) id NAA18286 for cvs-usrbin-outgoing; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 13:37:20 -0800 (PST) Received: from gvr.win.tue.nl (root@gvr.win.tue.nl [131.155.210.19]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA18271; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 13:37:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from guido@localhost) by gvr.win.tue.nl (8.8.5/8.8.2) id WAA08174; Tue, 25 Feb 1997 22:36:25 +0100 (MET) From: Guido van Rooij Message-Id: <199702252136.WAA08174@gvr.win.tue.nl> Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/su su.1 su.c In-Reply-To: from Daniel O'Callaghan at "Feb 25, 97 10:17:09 am" To: danny@panda.hilink.com.au (Daniel O'Callaghan) Date: Tue, 25 Feb 1997 22:36:25 +0100 (MET) Cc: ache@nagual.ru, guido@freefall.freebsd.org, CVS-committers@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-all@freefall.freebsd.org, cvs-usrbin@freefall.freebsd.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL28 (25)] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-cvs-usrbin@FreeBSD.ORG X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > > What about an explicit entry for 'everyone'? > e.g. wheel:*:0:* > > I'd much rather have people actively decide to allow su access than > passively allow it. There are no wldcards allowed in the forup member field. -Guido