From owner-freebsd-bugs Mon Dec 31 1:20: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@hub.freebsd.org Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE01D37B41F for ; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:20:01 -0800 (PST) Received: (from gnats@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fBV9K1F45679; Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:20:01 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from gnats) Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 01:20:01 -0800 (PST) Message-Id: <200112310920.fBV9K1F45679@freefall.freebsd.org> To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org Cc: From: Sheldon Hearn Subject: Re: bin/32935: /bin/sh builtin echo command Reply-To: Sheldon Hearn Sender: owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.org The following reply was made to PR bin/32935; it has been noted by GNATS. From: Sheldon Hearn To: Mike Heffner Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@freebsd.org Subject: Re: bin/32935: /bin/sh builtin echo command Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 11:16:45 +0200 On Mon, 31 Dec 2001 03:05:51 EST, Mike Heffner wrote: > Looks ok, except that I think in the '#define eflag 1' case it should > still accept '-ne' as valid and just ignore the 'e'. How about this: Thanks, Mike. But why would you want to accept an option that you don't support? Personally, I don't think -e support needs to be optional. :-) Ciao, Sheldon. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-bugs" in the body of the message