From owner-freebsd-chat Mon May 3 14:38: 7 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-chat@freebsd.org Received: from implode.root.com (root.com [209.102.106.178]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9D2AA1517D for ; Mon, 3 May 1999 14:38:04 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from root@implode.root.com) Received: from implode.root.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by implode.root.com (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA04185; Mon, 3 May 1999 14:35:11 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199905032135.OAA04185@implode.root.com> To: spork Cc: chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: new traffic record for wcarchive In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 03 May 1999 17:31:41 EDT." From: David Greenman Reply-To: dg@root.com Date: Mon, 03 May 1999 14:35:11 -0700 Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org >On Sun, 2 May 1999, David Greenman wrote: > >> The fast ethernet was completely saturated for the 24 hour period. There >> are plans to add additional network capacity, but no agreement has been >> made on this yet. > >Just curious, when the net connection is saturated, do you come in >out-of-band for maintenance? Or is the lag acceptable? Same as everyone else. The lag isn't too bad right now. We're talking about adding a private 100Mbps network between the web server and ftp server so that admin things (daily backups, etc) can happen in a timely manner. We're also talking about gigabit ethernet. -DG David Greenman Co-founder/Principal Architect, The FreeBSD Project - http://www.freebsd.org Creator of high-performance Internet servers - http://www.terasolutions.com To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message