From owner-freebsd-current  Sat Jan  4 02:37:18 1997
Return-Path: <owner-current>
Received: (from root@localhost)
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) id CAA10910
          for current-outgoing; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 02:37:18 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (time.cdrom.com [204.216.27.226])
          by freefall.freebsd.org (8.8.4/8.8.4) with ESMTP id CAA10905
          for <current@FreeBSD.ORG>; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 02:37:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from time.cdrom.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by time.cdrom.com (8.8.4/8.6.9) with ESMTP id CAA26025; Sat, 4 Jan 1997 02:37:05 -0800 (PST)
To: John Birrell <jb@cimlogic.com.au>
cc: joerg_wunsch@uriah.heep.sax.de, current@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: kernel w/o source? [MOD_DECL in lkm.h] 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Sat, 04 Jan 1997 11:51:27 +1100."
             <199701040051.LAA28752@freebsd1.cimlogic.com.au> 
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 1997 02:37:04 -0800
Message-ID: <26021.852374224@time.cdrom.com>
From: "Jordan K. Hubbard" <jkh@time.cdrom.com>
Sender: owner-current@FreeBSD.ORG
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> place. If the next WC CD came out with a minimal generic kernel
> (that was enough to get console & disk working) and everything
> else as lkms, then I would most likely _never_ build a kernel
> because my development work is done in user-space (except for

Yes, we like it!  We'll take it!  Go John go!  Rah rah rah! :-)

						Jordan