From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed May 29 11:19:55 2002 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from smtp.comcast.net (smtp.comcast.net [24.153.64.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66A8F37B40A for ; Wed, 29 May 2002 11:19:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from leto (pcp529856pcs.nash01.tn.comcast.net [68.52.131.181]) by mtaout04.icomcast.net (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.1 HotFix 0.8 (built May 13 2002)) with ESMTP id <0GWV00EPRXKY2O@mtaout04.icomcast.net> for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 29 May 2002 14:19:46 -0400 (EDT) Date: Wed, 29 May 2002 13:15:10 -0500 (CDT) From: "Brandon D. Valentine" Subject: Re: raidframe In-reply-to: <20020529182413.D53116@energyhq.homeip.net> X-X-Sender: bandix@leto.homeportal.2wire.net To: Miguel Mendez Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Message-id: <20020529131425.L38319-100000@leto.homeportal.2wire.net> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On Wed, 29 May 2002, Miguel Mendez wrote: >The latest raidframe patch seems to be a bit date now, I'd like to know >if any of you has worked on getting it cleanly applying to a recent >4.5-STABLE (4.6-RC indeed) system of even 5.0-CURRENT tree. I'd like to >play with it and would like to know if someone has taken care of it >before devoting time to making this patch work against a recent >-CURRENT. Is there a reason you can't use vinum(4)? Brandon D. Valentine -- http://www.geekpunk.net bandix@geekpunk.net ++[>++++++<-]>[<++++++>-]<.>++++[>+++++<-]>[<+++++>-]<+.+++++++..++ +.>>+++++[<++++++>-]<++.<<+++++++++++++++.>.+++.------.--------.>+. To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message