From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Jun 1 13:20:40 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1053137B401; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:20:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: from magic.adaptec.com (magic-mail.adaptec.com [208.236.45.100]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8091843F3F; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:20:39 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from scott_long@btc.adaptec.com) Received: from redfish.adaptec.com (redfish.adaptec.com [162.62.50.11]) by magic.adaptec.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id h51KFhZ00815; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:15:43 -0700 Received: from btc.adaptec.com ([10.100.253.187]) by redfish.adaptec.com (8.8.8p2+Sun/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA03642; Sun, 1 Jun 2003 13:20:38 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <3EDA600C.90104@btc.adaptec.com> Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 14:20:28 -0600 From: Scott Long User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; FreeBSD i386; en-US; rv:1.3) Gecko/20030425 X-Accept-Language: en-us, en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Petri Helenius References: <3ED9E8AB.5060106@he.iki.fi> <20030601232426.A43338@dilbert.robbins.dropbear.id.au> <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> In-Reply-To: <00b501c32876$74502fd0$812a40c1@PETEX31> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org cc: Tim Robbins Subject: Re: raidframe X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 01 Jun 2003 20:20:40 -0000 Petri Helenius wrote: >>RAIDframe is non-functional in 5.1 and -current [kern/50541] and it would be >>unwise to use it in 5.0 for anything other than experimentation. Hopefully it >>will be fixed before 5.2. >> > > Makes one wonder how broken code ever got into the tree in the first place... > > Pete > Just settle down a bit. If you rewind to last October, RAIDFrame worked well. Unfortunately, some kernel interfaces changed in between now and then and RAIDFrame was left behind. I am remis in not fixing it, but please understand that I also have quite a few other responsibilities, and I get paid $0 to work on RAIDframe. As for hardware raid, what cards have you tried, and what problems have you experienced? You last message was jsut a shot in the dark that few of us would be able to help with. Scott