From owner-svn-ports-head@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Sep 2 17:38:40 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6624E106564A; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:38:40 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from villa.alberto@gmail.com) Received: from mail-bk0-f54.google.com (mail-bk0-f54.google.com [209.85.214.54]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 686168FC12; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 17:38:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bkcje9 with SMTP id je9so2251457bkc.13 for ; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:38:38 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=cpni+wg98JVJse2qr5z98uRboecr8T7lPRERw2YFZOw=; b=jv7UnarGqNCfy7KBEQKoGhbWC0QITT8sGjsW5sy/s1pUC0tuHwHo3xCL3+BxRYBpNq 9e9wGPmUCmjByLpKws4h4IEs4gHDTZhx4JZxzYVjpIO6oXs01ofmRbguvWNnJ9K9NwPX 4mbrfByhS0BDgrd6BCXTdSOps/8Q9nuY8BrQPbHxvAqo+iNQ7VbtO+QYP0/hDIq0lyBN l16EZF5a/JlPmhUuwEDL+bmaQ2pnDAWTV5FXz89GHYXg6q7UQV0vn7d9g4bf3auTKBYd 7iKx6s6/5MnLiDG42I51jxmZPqmwAGYdxZzzyZemQqcOR7QZ8B1BiAYfq60xKESmZQji dtzA== Received: by 10.205.136.3 with SMTP id ii3mr5918539bkc.101.1346607518275; Sun, 02 Sep 2012 10:38:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: villa.alberto@gmail.com Received: by 10.204.147.217 with HTTP; Sun, 2 Sep 2012 10:38:18 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120902171159.GB10884@FreeBSD.org> References: <201208312252.q7VMqj07007701@svn.freebsd.org> <20120901040818.GA37499@FreeBSD.org> <20120902171159.GB10884@FreeBSD.org> From: Alberto Villa Date: Sun, 2 Sep 2012 19:38:18 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: KXvb7Ob-auc_eyYlFpLcYrgWaSI Message-ID: To: Alexey Dokuchaev Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org, svn-ports-all@freebsd.org, ports-committers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: svn commit: r303449 - head/Mk X-BeenThere: svn-ports-head@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: SVN commit messages for the ports tree for head List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 02 Sep 2012 17:38:40 -0000 On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 7:11 PM, Alexey Dokuchaev wrote: > Good question. I was hesitating about these two entries myself (whether to > add parenthesis or not). Eventually I decided that "Zeroconf support" is > important feature enough to be outlined on its own, thus embracing actual > implementation. Similar logic I used to reword CD ripping support (I went > even further with those three entries and dropped the "via" word as it > seemed to make the phrases too heavy -- again, I understand that this is > arguable). > > That said, it both cases that was my humble judgment based on how resulting > descriptions sound to my ear, esp. in combinations with other OPTIONs (I > studies a few hand-crafted examples before my commit). I do not feel > particularly strongly about it though; if folks think that all "via ..." > parts should be treated equally, I would not object dropping emphasizing > parenthesis. Sounds good enough to me. I think that, as long as we manage to keep descriptions consistent, some small variations are acceptable. I think that a draft policy should be written, though, otherwise this whole effort can turn into a real mess. -- Alberto Villa, FreeBSD committer http://people.FreeBSD.org/~avilla