From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Sep 24 04:46:52 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 107D216A473 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:46:52 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.192.90]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B527413C4B0 for ; Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:46:51 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) Received: from TEDSDESK (nat-rtr.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com [65.75.197.130]) by mail.freebsd-corp-net-guide.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id l8O4kogT039130 for ; Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:46:51 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from tedm@toybox.placo.com) From: "Ted Mittelstaedt" To: "User Questions" Date: Sun, 23 Sep 2007 21:47:10 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 (Normal) X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook IMO, Build 9.0.6604 (9.0.2911.0) X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1896 In-Reply-To: <20070922132322.7027.GERARD-SEIBERT@seibercom.net> Importance: Normal Subject: RE: Re[2]: Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD? X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 24 Sep 2007 04:46:52 -0000 > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Gerard > Sent: Saturday, September 22, 2007 10:25 AM > To: User Questions > Subject: Re[2]: Why is sendmail in the core of FreeBSD? > > > On September 22, 2007 at 09:07AM Robert C Wittig wrote: > > > > Yep... if it works, don't 'fix' it. > > Absolutely! The hell with technological advances. Lets stay with those > rock solid 8088 processors. > > Postfix and Exim aren't technological advances to Sendmail. They are just different ways of doing things. The correct analogy would be "to hell with those 6502 processors. Let's stay with those rock solid 8080 processors" In which case it would be obvious to all how silly the statement was. Ted