Date: Fri, 01 Sep 2000 07:53:32 +0000 From: rob <europax@home.com> To: Mike Meyer <mwm@mired.org> Cc: Johannes Zwart <johannes@jak.nl>, questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Why not XEmacs, after all? Message-ID: <39AF607C.811D6424@home.com> References: <14767.47786.569589.118725@guru.mired.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
After I saw the first post I checked out Xemacs. I have the latest port, and it doesn't seem to render web pages very well at all. In fact, I couldn't find a single one that looked right. What am I doing wrong? I agree about Netscape. I am waiting for Mozilla with all of the features for FreeBSD. I will check out w3m today. Rob. > > > > XEmacs seems to be a much better web > > > browser than Netscape. Actually, combining all these > > > different functions, it seems to be the ultimate > > > editor. > > I don't agree. It's slow, and I hate having my editor tied up fetching > and displaying web pages. I use w3m as a primary browser. I configure > it as the first external browser (so I can "open link in new window"), > netscape as the second external browser (so poorly written or highly > graphical pages can be displayed with a few keystrokes), and a script > that adds the link to my cross-platform multi-browser hotlist as the > third external browser. > > <mike > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?39AF607C.811D6424>