From owner-freebsd-hackers Wed Nov 10 7:59:34 1999 Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from luna.lyris.net (luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AFA914FA2 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:59:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from kip@lyris.com) Received: from luna.shelby.com by luna.lyris.net (8.9.1b+Sun/SMI-SVR4) id HAA02546; Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:58:39 -0800 (PST) Received: from (luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6]) by luna.shelby.com with SMTP (MailShield v1.50); Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:58:39 -0700 Date: Wed, 10 Nov 1999 07:58:39 -0800 (PST) From: Kip Macy X-Sender: kip@luna To: Reinier Bezuidenhout Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: cc -pthread and libc_r question In-Reply-To: <199911101239.OAA23318@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SMTP-HELO: luna X-SMTP-MAIL-FROM: kip@lyris.com X-SMTP-RCPT-TO: rbezuide@oskar.dev.nanoteq.co.za,freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-SMTP-PEER-INFO: luna.shelby.com [207.90.155.6] Sender: owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Which program was it? A number of programs like tcslh and wish explicitly ask for libc when linking. A practice I have never understood. On Wed, 10 Nov 1999, Reinier Bezuidenhout wrote: > Hi .. > > I've compiled a program with the -pthread compiler option on a > 3.3-STABLe system ... after doing a ldd on the executable I see that > both libc_r AND lic are linked .. is this correct ? > > Shouldn't libc_r replace libc ? > > Thanks > > Reinier > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-hackers" in the body of the message