From owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Feb 28 02:06:21 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 66D3316A420 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:06:21 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (it.buh.tecnik93.com [81.196.204.98]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA39C43D45 for ; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:06:20 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from itetcu@people.tecnik93.com) Received: from it.buh.tecnik93.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by it.buh.tecnik93.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5864D17208; Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:06:16 +0200 (EET) Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 04:06:15 +0200 From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu To: "Jeremy Messenger" Message-ID: <20060228040615.1e1a26fc@it.buh.tecnik93.com> In-Reply-To: References: <440377FF.4020502@kelleycows.com> <20060227225357.GA87738@xor.obsecurity.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed-Claws 2.0.0 (GTK+ 2.8.12; i386-portbld-freebsd6.0) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: Christopher Kelley , freebsd-ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway Subject: Re: libtool note in UPDATING X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Porting software to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:06:21 -0000 On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:42:03 -0600 "Jeremy Messenger" wrote: > On Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:53:57 -0600, Kris Kennaway > wrote: > > > On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 02:06:55PM -0800, Christopher Kelley wrote: > >> Am I reading the entry for libtool in UPDATING correctly? It > >> seems to me to basically say "There's no way to tell you how to > >> successfully update your ports with the new libtool, hope you > >> really understand how all the ports interact with each other, good > >> night and good luck." > >> > >> Now, I *DO* sort of understand the need for this change from > >> reading the entry, and I'm not arguing the fact that the change > >> needed to be made. I just don't know where to go from here because > >> now I'm afraid to update any of my ports since I'm not sure I > >> would understand the output of the -n flag enough to figure out > >> how to update my ports. > >> > >> Is there a more straightforward explanation of how to upgrade > >> ports with the new libtool? > > > > Basically, portupgrade -a should be OK (but watch out for the perl > > upgrade as well, i.e. read that entry too). If you run into > > problems let us know; I'd like to refine that entry with a working > > prescription before the release. > > I doubt the 'portupgrade -a' will working on any ports that depend > on glib12, gtk12 and etc. I would go with -af or -afr to force > rebuild all apps if you want to use portupgrade instead remove ports > and reinstall stuff as suggested in the UPDATING. portupgrade -Rfp `ls -1 /var/db/pkg/` followed by a portupgrade -Rp ` portversion -vL= | sed 's/[ ]*<.*$//' ` left me with only jdk-1.5.0p2_2, kdesdk-3.5.1, kdevelop-3.3.1 and subversion-1.3.0_3 (plus other 3 fixed in the mean time) not upgraded out of 750 ports on my desktop (basically all kde and gnome, linux compat, devel and multimedia stuff). Took 3 days+ on a amd64 3200+ (running i386 mode) with 1GB dual-channel RAM and WRKDIRPREFIX set to a separate from /usr SATA disk; all was done while running KDE, azureus, mysql and some other things; the good part is that it didn't interrupt my work. Before starting portupgrade I did a make config-recursive twice for all installed ports since I didn't build ports on this machine in the last months (installed from packages built on an other box) and I'm far from using the defaults. And yes, I do HATE ports that use custom scripts when they could use OPTIONS. Of course, the above can't be the way for an UPDATING entry :) -- IOnut - Unregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "Intellectual Property" is nowhere near as valuable as "Intellect" BOFH excuse #201: