From owner-freebsd-net Thu Jul 20 8: 3:13 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Received: from web.mercuryfilmworks.com (web.mercuryfilmworks.com [209.17.176.194]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0D13E37B821 for ; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:03:05 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from derrick@mercuryfilmworks.com) Received: from localhost (derrick@localhost) by web.mercuryfilmworks.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id IAA01116; Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:04:23 -0700 X-Authentication-Warning: web.mercuryfilmworks.com: derrick owned process doing -bs Date: Thu, 20 Jul 2000 08:04:23 -0700 (PDT) From: Derrick MacPherson To: Luigi Rizzo Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: AltQ/dummynet & IP accounting.. In-Reply-To: <200007201411.QAA56271@info.iet.unipi.it> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org > for that, probably a picobsd-based bridge does the job fairly well. > there is a floppy image at http://www.iet.unipi.it/~luigi/ip_dummynet/ > which also has Weighted Fair Queueing enabled. How would this handle a 10 meg connection and +400 machines? Is it going to bog down significantly? wWhat about if I add full firewalling capabalities? To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-net" in the body of the message