From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG  Wed Jun 23 15:38:01 2004
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C697916A4CE
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:38:01 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from cs1.cs.huji.ac.il (cs1.cs.huji.ac.il [132.65.16.10])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EB1F43D31
	for <freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>;
	Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:38:01 +0000 (GMT)
	(envelope-from danny@cs.huji.ac.il)
Received: from pampa.cs.huji.ac.il ([132.65.80.32] ident=danny)
	by cs1.cs.huji.ac.il with esmtp
	id 1Bd9p2-0008hs-8Y
	for freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org; Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:38:00 +0300
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.6.3 04/04/2003 with nmh-1.0.4
To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 18:38:00 +0300
From: Danny Braniss <danny@cs.huji.ac.il>
Message-Id: <20040623153801.7EB1F43D31@mx1.FreeBSD.org>
Subject: waiting on sbwait
X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD
	<freebsd-hackers.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-hackers>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-hackers>,
	<mailto:freebsd-hackers-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2004 15:38:01 -0000

Hi,
	We have a host running samba under -stable 4.10, and quiet frequently
it becomes uresponsive, hitting ^T gives 

load: 0.00  cmd: ls 12807 [sbwait] 0.00u 0.00s 0% 160k

so my guess is that we are running out of some resource (socket buffer).

so, if this is true, is there some sysctl to increase?

danny