From owner-freebsd-net@freebsd.org Sun Jun 5 23:14:23 2016 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-net@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E2DE1B6B103 for ; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:14:23 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "."@babolo.ru) Received: from smtp.babolo.ru (smtp.babolo.ru [194.58.246.31]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "smtp.babolo.ru", Issuer "babolo" (not verified)) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 736B91CDC; Sun, 5 Jun 2016 23:14:22 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from "."@babolo.ru) Received: from cicuta.babolo.ru (cicuta.babolo [127.0.2.61]) by smtp.babolo.ru (8.15.2/8.15.2) with SMTP id u55N3RIL062505; Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:03:27 +0300 (MSK) (envelope-from "."@babolo.ru) Received: (nullmailer pid 35422 invoked by uid 136); Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:14:07 -0000 Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 02:14:07 +0300 From: Aleksandr A Babaylov <"."@babolo.ru> To: "Alexander V. Chernikov" Cc: ??zkan KIRIK , "freebsd-net@freebsd.org" , "Julian K." Subject: Re: IPFW: table support for MAC addresses? Message-ID: <20160605231407.GB35289@babolo.ru> References: <574D89F6.3030806@kornberger.name> <57502430.1030309@kornberger.name> <20160603131146.GA26528@babolo.ru> <4150711465123272@web4h.yandex.ru> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <4150711465123272@web4h.yandex.ru> X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22 Precedence: list List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 05 Jun 2016 23:14:24 -0000 On Sun, Jun 05, 2016 at 01:41:12PM +0300, Alexander V. Chernikov wrote: > 05.06.2016, 11:45, "??zkan KIRIK" : > > I also need this feature > > Are you fine with exact-match mac addresses? Yes, exact-match is fine for me. > (E.g. new array/hash tabletype with the ability to do exact lookup on the source/destination mac address, w/o any masks support). > > On Fri, Jun 3, 2016 at 4:11 PM, Aleksandr A Babaylov <"."@babolo.ru> wrote: > >> šOn Thu, Jun 02, 2016 at 02:18:56PM +0200, Julian K. wrote: > >> š> is there anyone who wants to use MAC based rules with IPFW? > >> š> I want to build a captive portal that also supports IPv6. MAC addresses > >> š> in IPFW tables would help a lot. > >> šI use MAC in IPFW and want MAC in IPFW tables to simplify rules.