Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2001 09:09:59 +1000 From: Edwin Groothuis <edwin@mavetju.org> To: Sheldon Hearn <sheldonh@starjuice.net> Cc: freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: The cost of profiling support Message-ID: <20010907090959.G23013@k7.mavetju.org> In-Reply-To: <68118.999789178@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>; from sheldonh@starjuice.net on Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:12:58PM %2B0200 References: <68118.999789178@axl.seasidesoftware.co.za>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Thu, Sep 06, 2001 at 05:12:58PM +0200, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > Is there a performance hit for having built profiling support into an > executable if the support isn't actually used? Yes and no. Not that it will show off as a performance hit in the program, but suddenly track is being kept of all the functions entered and returned from. Edwin -- Edwin Groothuis | Personal website: http://www.MavEtJu.org edwin@mavetju.org | Interested in MUDs? Visit Fatal Dimensions: ------------------+ http://www.FatalDimensions.org/ To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20010907090959.G23013>